Industrial Revolution and Absolutism :: essays research papers

Section I, promontory 2In the early 17th century absolutism was non all thought of in the theological sense it was also a policy-making catch word all through out Europe. England had a a few(prenominal) regulations attempt to create an absolute monarchy. James I and Charles I both tried to wee complete rule over the country without consulting Parliament. Parliament, which had a large portion of control, prevented these two rulers from successfully hindering their power. The citizens of England were very workout to the combined rule of the king and Parliament. So they were not very intense or impulsive to release all the power to a ace person. In Parliament an official could be changed if need be, and no single person could in charge of decision making. This is one of the main benefits to having a Parliamentary type of presidency. Toward the middle of the 17th century troubles between Charles I and Parliament sparked Englands civil war. This in turn created problems for future rulers with aspirations intimately ruling without Parliament. Englands civil war was basically the death of majestic absolutism eventually Parliaments power grew to the point that it became the head body of government in England. Royal absolutism failed horribly in England, this however was not the case in France. France did not have a power equal to Parliament to try and compete against the monarch for control. The citizens of France were also more willing to accept a single head of government. Most felt that having this real leader would help protect them and keep the peace within their country. So in conclusion it is clear to see that both systems of government have benefits and drawbacks. Parliament can help a country make mitigate well rounded decisions and also keep a corrupt ruler in check. Absolutism, with the right leader, can help citizens feel more ripe give the country a strong image. So in the dismiss it comes down to what the people want and feel comforta ble with. Section II, Question 3The Industrial Revolution in its simplest form was the creation and subroutine of power driven machinery in manufacturing. It began very subtly. There was a growth demand for agriculture and textiles and the current machinery was unable to keep up. One of the showtime advances in machinery was the use of water power. Mill owners created machines that could use the power of a flowing stream to enhance the speed of their textile machines.