Transnational Social Movements, International Nongovernmental Organizat

Transnational Social Movements, internationalist Nongovernmental Organizations and Our State-centric WorldThe 1999 Seattle protests brought the apparent proliferation of anti-globalization grassroot sociopolitical movements into the limelight of the world stage. Transnational social movements (TSMs), international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs), as well as the loose transnational activist networks (TANs) that shoot themall these came to be seen as an angry and no less soused backlash thats directed at the powerful states and increasingly towering sparing IGOs such as the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank. In the field of international relations, some regard this as a prophetic watershed event that signals the enfeebling and perhaps even collapsing of the state-centric system of international relations, while many others swan that Seattle is but an eventually insignificant episode in the book of globalization and state power, as evidenced by the Doha success.This paper a ttempts to engineer two call into questions that are at the heart of this dispute Do TSMs and INGOs prevail any real power in todays international political reach against the traditional view of state dominance? And, if the answer to the previous question is yes, then does such a change merit a organic revision of the state-centric model of international relations?My answer to these two questions is three times First, I assert that TSMs and INGOs can and have posed substantial normative challenges to state hegemony, most commonly the image that the state enjoys a monopoly on representation of its citizens and their interests. Furthermore, TSMs and INGOs that employ the use of violence (particularly terrorism) breach the conventional notion that states... ...edArjomand, Said Amir. Irans Islamic Revolution in Comparative Perspective. World Politics, garishness 38, number 3 (1986. 4), 383-414.Griffith, William E. The Revial of Islamic Fundamentalism the Case of Iran. Interna tional Security. Volume 4, Issue 1, 1979, 132-138.Khashan, Hilal. The New World Order and the Tempo of Militant Islam. British ledger of Middle Eastern Studies. Volume 24, Issue 1 (1997. 5), 5-24.OBrien, Robert, et al. Contesting Glboal Governance. Cambridge, 2000.G. Hossein. Legitimacy, Religion, and Nationalism in the Middle East. The American Political Science follow, Volume 84, Issue 1 (1990. 3), 69-91.Tarrow, Sidney. Transnational Politics Contention and Institutions in International Politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2001.4. Weaver, Mary Ann. The Real Bin Laden. The New Yorker, January 24, 2000.